Crucial p5 1tb4/28/2023 Where this drive could also be better is in respect of large file writes, where the cache becomes saturated and reveals the underlying NAND performance. At this pricing, I’d probably take the WD SN850 if given a choice, and that hints that the price of the P5 Plus is a little on the high side for what it offers. However, it’s much closer in price to the WD SN850 and Samsung 980 Pro, drives that are faster and have much better IOPS numbers if throughput is important. But conversely, the P5 Plus costs around 80% of the FireCuda 530 for the same capacity. Seagate FireCuda 530, this was never going to beat that competition. Having seen some remarkably quick drives, like the incredible The new features added to the P5 over the P2 are all retained, making this drive adhere to TCG Opal 2.0 specification, including IEEE 1667 features and eDrive compliant. The TBW of the P5 wasn’t poor, and with the 250GB no longer an option, the lowest TBW is now 300TB for the 500GB part, which is fine. That these values haven’t changed isn’t a big problem. What hasn’t changed been improved is the endurance, as these drives have the same TBW (Total Bytes Written) as their P5 counterparts, with the 2TB offering 1,200TB of lifespan. That makes the 500GB drive faster at writing than all the P5 capacities, and read speeds are nearly doubled for all sizes. These drives offer a sequential read speed of 6,600MB/s irrespective of capacity, and 5,000MB/w sequential writing on the 1TB and 2TB drives, and 3,600MB/s writes on the 500GB option. If we compare the P5 Plus to the P5 purely based on Crucial quoted numbers, the difference is striking at every capacity, with even the 500GB model seeing significant improvements.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |